The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is the diagram delineating how to produce clothes from the recycled plastic bottles.
It is perceptible that this is a linear process with multiple steps, which commences with collecting the bottles and ends at making the finished clothes.
Initially, the various sized bottles are delivered to the factory by lorries after being gathered from discrete places. The second stage is that they are categorised based on distinct criteria before being cut into the tiny pieces. These pellets are shortly afterwards cleaned with the support of a specialized machine. Subsequently, they are naturally dried under the heat of the sun for 10 consecutive hours in the aim to withdraw absolute moisture from the material to prepare for the boiling step inside a cylinder. This is followed by a straining stage when they are flexible enough to be stretched before being rolled to create the coloured yarns. Thenceforth, threads are woven by a weaving machine prior to producing the fabric rolls, which are employed to make final clothes as the ultimate step of this course.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-09 | Ahmad_off | 84 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Daniel3003 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | alohahahihi | view | |
| 2023-08-25 | Duc2711@ | view |
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009 The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants 73
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people Agree or disagree 84
- The table below shows a survey on the preference of different age groups in a European country on different TV programmes in 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph shows the value in US dollars in millions of dollars of investment in funds of four categories from 1988 to 2014 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, second, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14942528736 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64055287532 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66091954023 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2034183469 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135161304378 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549648879908 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560489052999 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111802330282 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387704694568 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.