The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles. Summarize the
information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where
relevant.
The diagram explains how wasted glass bottles are recycled.
Overall, there are three stages in the process, beginning with the collection of disposed glass bottles and culminating in delivering new bottles to places of consumption.
To begin, glass bottles are assembled at a collection point. After being collected, they are transported to a factory. The bottles are washed under high-pressure water before being categorized based on three colours which are clear, green and brown. Afterwards, they are delivered to a glass factory, where they are broken into smaller glass pieces. The next step is that the bottles are burned in a furnace at a temperature of 600 to 800 degrees Celsius as hard glass pieces turn into liquid. The new liquid glass will be added to recycled liquid glass before the mixture is shaped into a glass mould.
In the final stage, brand-new glass bottles are produced and ready for sale in the supermarket.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 67 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 61 | view |
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | view | |
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | 73 | view |
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- The chart below shows the annual number of rentals and sales( in various formats) of film from a particular store between 2002 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The maps below show the village of stockeford in 1930 and 2010 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and ready for sale in the supermarket.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 791.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13636363636 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66126839472 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9418007864 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8888888889 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.0 5.23603664747 0% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189428864012 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858802052954 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465978334982 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125717546839 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299241500201 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.