The pictures illustrate how the layout of a school library changed over five years.
The picture given depicts the modernization of the layout of a library over a period of 5 years.
It is evident from the picture that the library has undergone some noticeable transformations, with the most typical one is the introductions of more studying tables. Additionally, some amenities have been erected.
5 years ago, in the middle of the library was studying tables, which were flanked by book shelves to the top and those to the bottom. At the same time, a desk for computers and a library office were situated in the top-right and bottom-right corners respectively. Meanwhile, in the bottom-left area, there was a meeting room adjacent to a classroom to the top and a borrowing and returning desk to the bottom.
Up to now, whereas more private studying tables have been constructed in the middle of the library, the book shelves located in the bottom area 5 years ago have been converted into desks for students’ laptops. Likewise, a conference room has been built in the position where the library office used to be, accompanied by the substitution of desks for students’ laptops for the desk for computers. By contrast, the locations of the meeting room and the book shelves in the top area have not experienced any change, compared to the construction of a recording studio next to the meeting room to the top. In addition, the borrowing and returning desk has been splited into 2 separate parts called borrowing and returning.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 340, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o be, accompanied by the substitution of desks for students’ laptops for the desk...
^^
Line 4, column 619, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eeting room to the top. In addition, the borrowing and returning desk has been sp...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1208.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9306122449 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95299846202 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49387755102 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 376.2 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3591769988 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.8 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106840436587 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546561268051 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786937233909 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107013740953 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0952281434676 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.