The pictures show information about average income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in a city in the UK.
The given charts show how much an average family in UK earned and how they spent on food and clothes between 2010 and 2013.
Overall, there was a decline in the average income of an ordinary family living in the UK, while the spending on food and clothes of them experienced an increase. Particularly, the expenditure on clothes and meat and fish fell in 2013, meanwhile, the figures for dairy products and fruits and vegetables rose between the 2 years.
The total income of an average family in the UK started at 29,000 pounds, after which it saw a decrease by 4000 pounds in the year 2013. In contrast, their spending on food and clothes climbed up from 14000 pounds to 15000 pounds between 2010 and 2013.
22 percent and 25 percent of the family's income were spent on clothes and meat and fish, both followed by a sharp decrease by 10 percent of the spending in 2013. In addition, the figures for the expenditure on dairy products and fruits and vegetables were 15 percent and 20 percent in the first year, which then increased to 20 percent and 35 percent respectively in the final year of the period. Additionally, the money which the family used to buy other food and drinks remained unchangeable at 18 percent throughout the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-09 | vuhungbo | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | vuhungbo | 61 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | Johndavisvu | 67 | view |
| 2021-03-28 | Narges.s | 72 | view |
| 2020-02-21 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 72 | view |
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014 67
- The table below shows population figures for 4 countries for 2003 and projected figures for 2025 and 2050 67
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagram below shows the process of making carbonated drinks Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table below gives information on visitor statistics for 1996 1998 and 2000 for various World Heritage sites in Australia 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, then, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 6.8 265% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1024.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65454545455 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51489776011 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477272727273 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.1843360034 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307374611995 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154439088405 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132315888767 0.0843802449381 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225702463876 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.092699270536 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, then, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 6.8 265% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1024.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65454545455 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51489776011 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477272727273 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.1843360034 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307374611995 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154439088405 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132315888767 0.0843802449381 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225702463876 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.092699270536 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.