The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart illustrates the main factors contributed to the degradation of land on the worldwide scale whereas the table demonstrates the way these factors influenced three separate regions including North America, Europe, and Oceania.
Generally, over-grazing was the major cause resulted in the global degradation of land, and Europe was the region that was affected the most.
In specific, 35%, 30%, and 28% of land was degraded because of over-grazing, deforestation, and over-cultivation, respectively.
Divided by region, it can be seen that 23% of land in Europe was degraded, mostly caused by deforestation (9.8%), and over-cultivation (7.7%). Oceania had less percentage of land degraded than Europe, with the total 13%. It is surprised that over-cultivation was not a reason affected the land degradation in Oceania (with zero percent) but rather was over-grazing (11.3%). North America was the region that been less effected by the land degradation with only 5% of land degraded in total. The percentage of deforestation in this region was only 0.2%, and that of over-grazing was 1.5%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, whereas, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40935672515 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30825696393 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.482926829268 1242% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6206230346 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.625 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138988299118 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073335642187 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453904764677 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942264604466 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555461689971 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.