the pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart illustrates the percentage of four distinct reasons which agricultural land becomes less productive during the 1990s, and the table give(s) some information about three areas that agricultural lands could affect in the same time.
It is obvious that the over-grazing has a crucial role in the crops and yields in whole of the world. In Europe degradation by region has maximum percent and in all three reasons located in the first place.
As can be seen, Over-cultivation by 28% impact less than two other groups. The deforestation and over-grazing are two main causes of less product by ordered 30% and 35%. Most of districts has became grazing for domestic animals. The last group include some different causes which by 7% located in the last place throughout the 1990s. The North America except in over-cultivation has minimum percent in other fields by 5% total land degraded. The oceania because did not have enough free area in over-cultivation did not effect but over-grazing in this area has maximum percent off 13%. Although these areas in various groups are maximum and minimum percent the Europe by 23% of total land degraded has the first rank.
As a result, over-grazing has very important cause of world wide land degradation and could affect on different areas.
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 Summarise the information by seleting and reroting the main features and make comprasions where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable be shared freely Discuss both these views and give yo 73
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 61
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the districts') or simply say ''Most districts''.
Suggestion: Most of the districts; Most districts
...of less product by ordered 30% and 35%. Most of districts has became grazing for domestic animals...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...other fields by 5% total land degraded. The oceania because did not have enough fre...
^^^
Line 3, column 521, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[5]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...h free area in over-cultivation did not effect but over-grazing in this area has maxim...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 55, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...ver-grazing has very important cause of world wide land degradation and could affect on di...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, as a result, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1080.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04672897196 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84324195342 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579439252336 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.5161400853 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1818181818 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4545454545 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216121627352 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773013663367 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.091411792528 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15094999876 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10414574315 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.