the pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. the table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart illustrates the percentage of people who are less productive of agricultural lands in four different groups, and the table shows the effects of it in three regions of the world during the 1990s.
In general, the most important cause related to over-grazing 35 percent in Europe affected more than other regions 7.7 percent during the 1990s.
As can be seen, there are three main causes that agricultural lands become less productive such as over-grazing, deforestation, and over-cultivation ordered by 35,30, and 28 percent, and another group exists too which is no longer significant. Europe was affected more than others in the mentioned causes. Deforestation has 9.8 percent amount of 23 percent and remained related to over-cultivation and over-grazing by 7.7 and 5.5 percent. This reason causes people who live in that region to gain more land for agriculture and farmers have a tendency because of their rich soil. After Europe, Oceania is located in second place with a total of 13 percent over-grazing affected of 11.3 percent and finally North America by 5 percent located at third place that over-cultivation in this region has most affected agriculture during the 1990s. Although amount of These regions North America has less deforestation, the minimum percent related to Oceania in over-cultivation group.
In total, during the 1990s Europe was affected more than other regions by 23 percent.
- The two maps below show road access to city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows he quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 67
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 78
- Every year several languages die out Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, second, so, third, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1198.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27753303965 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06441420178 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52422907489 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.7375018008 43.030603864 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.111111111 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2222222222 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240635785933 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115952460598 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0981892346646 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183898607453 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104959641871 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.