The pie chart illustrates the four main causes responsible for the degradation of the farmland. The table shows the proportion of land degradation in three different regions of the world.
Overall, it is evident that overgrazing was the most popular cause of global degradation, followed by over-cultivation. By contrast, other causes contributed the least to the degradation of land. In the same way, Europe experienced the highest degradation of the farmland while North America was the least affected of all three regions.
Over-grazing accounted for over a third of the worldwide degradation while deforestation stood at just under a third. Likewise, a further 28 percent of the land degradation was due to over cultivation, four times as much as is caused by other factors.
The impact of over-grazing on Oceania was the highest at 11.3 percent as compared to just 1.5 percent on North America. Europe had the highest overall percentage of land degraded at 23 percent and the main causes were deforestation and over-cultivation at 9.8 percent and 7.7 percent respectively. The striking point was that over-cultivation that did a lot of damage to the farmland in Europe did not cause any damage to the land in Oceania. North America had the lower proportion of land degraded at 5%, over cultivation being a larger contributory factor at 3.3% as opposed to over grazing and deforestation at 1.5% and 0.2%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, likewise, third, while, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1188.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1652173913 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22831283811 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 365.4 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4872511549 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 1.13902439024 878% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11997539573 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675672687371 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757714544802 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111079062085 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108254676542 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.