The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. the table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make the comparison where relevant.
The given graph illustrates the main causes of the less productive agriculture. While the table explains the affected regions including North American, Europe, and Oceania during 1990s.
It is evident that, the main reason causes the land degradation is an over-grazing in the world. While in Europe continent, the highest reason causes the degradation is a deforestation.
when it comes to pie graph, it interprets the four reasons. The first reason is an over-cultivation an account 28%. Then the over-grazing and deforestation are the second and third reasons with its proportion thirty per cent, and 35% respectively. As consequence, it is more than the over-cultivation. Moreover, 30% of degraded land is from a deforestation, which is more than the over-cultivation and less than over-grazing.
the given table gives information about land degradation in three different regions. In addition, the region has the highest degraded land is in Europe with 23 as a total percentage. However, the lowest degraded land is in North America with 5%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1990s'.
Suggestion: during the 1990s
...ing North American, Europe, and Oceania during 1990s. It is evident that, the main reason c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...es the degradation is a deforestation. when it comes to pie graph, it interprets th...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ultivation and less than over-grazing. the given table gives information about lan...
^^^
Line 4, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bout land degradation in three different regions. In addition, the region has the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, second, so, then, third, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37575757576 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38653955207 2.65546596893 128% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563636363636 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.8074529572 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.9166666667 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.75 22.9334400587 60% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 6.08333333333 5.23603664747 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193867305052 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742551418808 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581988771991 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134235630912 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614208895781 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.33 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.