The Pie chart gives information about the country of birth of people living in Australia and the table shows where people born in these countries live.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided diagram illustrates data regarding where habitats of Australia were born while the table depicts where people that were born in these countries live.
To begin with the diagram, it can be clearly seen that native Australians account for the majority of Australia’s habitats with an impressive 73%. The next biggest percentage are people that were born in other countries without specifying which country exactly with a mere 14%. When it comes to those born in the UK it is apparent that they account for only 7% of the whole population. Lastly, New Zealand, China and the Netherlands are the countries that the least habitats were born ranging from just 1% to 3%
Moving on to the table, the majority of habitats have chosen to live in cities rather than in rural areas. More specifically, a significant 99% of those born in China lives in cities with just 1% of people living in rural areas. Similar percentages are indicated for those born in the Netherlands and the UK with 90% and 89% of individuals respectively living in cities. Natives living in cities accounted for a smaller but still significant percentage of 83% while those born in New Zealand were the ones with the least habitats of big cities with a percentage of 3% lower than the previous.
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 67
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon from egg to adult fish Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The illustrations show two stages in the development of the mobile phone Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- People are having more and more sugar based drinks What are the reasons What are the solutions to make people drink less 73
- Some people believe that giving longer prison sentences is the best way to reduce crime Others believe that there are better ways to reduce crime Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, lastly, regarding, still, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1062.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87155963303 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66421765613 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509174311927 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.3832845114 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.75 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212686525283 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111432012407 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0966381458744 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188849851194 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982326892464 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.