People are having more and more sugar-based drinks. What are the reasons? What are the solutions to make people drink less.
In today’s world the number of people buying sugar-based drinks increases dangerously harming many individual’s health. This incident occurs mainly due to the lack of time of some people and also due to advertisement. However, there are numerous solutions that can be enforced in order to solve even partly the problem.
To begin with, as it is aforementioned the main reason why people drink so many sugar-based drinks is that the majority of individuals are obliged to spend most of their day working so they inevitably consume fast food along with sugary drinks almost daily since they do not have the time to search for a healthier solution. For instance, a woman working 10 hours per day does not have the time or strength to make healthy juices or smoothies. What is more, advertising is another factor that increases the consumption of those drinks since humans tend to always buy the products that are advertised the most. Finally, their tastefulness is another crucial reason why those drinks are consumed so much.
However, there are several solutions that will solve or at least eliminate that issue. First and foremost, it would be very helpful to ban the advertisement of those kinds of drinks since the have been proved to cause almost as many diseases as smoking. Instead healthier choices such as fresh juices, fruit, vegetables and a healthy lifestyle should be promoted more. This solution may not prevent all people from buying sugar-based drinks but it will lead to more and more people not knowing the existence of some of them the following years. Additionally, free seminars about the risks of consuming those drinks could be organized in order for people to educate and learn about what they put into their bodies.
In conclusion, the main reasons why the number of people consuming these drinks rises fast is their tastefulness, the lack of time and also advertising. However, I believe that if the aforementioned suggestions were enforced, the number of those consumers could decrease significantly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-24 | giangngoc | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-25 | Nguyen Ho Khanh Duy | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-02 | bapcai | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-17 | tieuquynh | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-22 | Nguyễn Ngọc Phương Vy | 73 | view |
- The illustrations show two stages in the development of the mobile phone Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments Others believe those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit Discuss both these views and give 61
- The Pie chart gives information about the country of birth of people living in Australia and the table shows where people born in these countries live Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva 77
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 67
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon from egg to adult fish Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...use almost as many diseases as smoking. Instead healthier choices such as fresh juices,...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, so, at least, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11077844311 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76495182342 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544910179641 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0716042872 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.928571429 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404184780131 0.244688304435 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120851016591 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953149305148 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230024706347 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0940351110671 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.