The pie chart shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
The main factors contributing to less productive land in the 1990s are illustrated on the pie chart. While the causes of land degradation in three regions in the similar years are reported on the table. Overall, it is evidence that over-grazing and deforestation were two main contributors to worldwide land degradation. Furthermore, the largest degraded land was reported in Europe.
To begin with, more than one-third of land degradation in the world was led by over-grazing of livestock, followed by deforestation and over-cultivated land at 30% and 28% respectively.
Moving to the table, as many as 23% of land in Europe was in a degraded state, and two main reasons of which were deforestation (9,8%) and fast-farming activities (7,7%). In Oceania, 13% of the land was reported less productive with over-grazing (11,3%) as the leading factor contributing to this problem. However, in this region, there was no degraded land related to over-used agricultural land. In addition, the lowest percentage of degraded land was showed in North America with over-cultivation responsible for the highest figure (3,3%), and over-grazing and deforestation at 1,5% and 0,2% each.
- The table below gives information about the daily cost of water per person in five different countries Figures are based on the minimum daily requirement per peron of 11 5 litres 73
- Many people today do not feel safe either at home or when they are out What are the causes What are the solutions 61
- The line graph demonstrates how the percentage of British families that owned different number of cars oscillated between 1971 and 2007
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 61
- Film stars and celebrities often share their views on public matters that have little to do with their profession Is this a positive or negative development 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...1990s are illustrated on the pie chart. While the causes of land degradation in three...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, so, third, while, in addition, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39890710383 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42596368183 2.65546596893 129% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551912568306 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8425916148 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.777777778 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209452025379 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110773166288 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858535056906 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146985029407 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0896119720316 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.