The pie chart shows the main reasons why agricultural land become less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990.
The circular representation reveals the information about the global farmland destruction by three main activities: over cultivation, deforestation, and overgrazing. Whereas, the tabular chart demonstrates the total land degraded in three nations, during the period of 1990.
Overall, it is crystal clear that, overgrazing is the main culprit of soil depletion, compares to the other three factors, in the case of Europe region.
In the first glance, the highest proportion of land damage was caused by overgrazing, was claimed to be more than third , in the year 1990. Apart from this, the another major culprits were deforestation, and over cultivation, which constituted 30% and 28% respectively, of the total lost land. Although, other causes had been accounted for just 7%, of the degraded earth.
Probing ahead, according to the table, Europe was adversely affected region with 23% of the total land, destroyed by deforestation at 9.8%, overgrazing at 5.5%, and over cultivation at 7.7%, respectively. In contrast, North America suffered least damage of the total land destruction, was just 5%. Furthermore, not only was over cultivation insignificant in Oceania, but also deforestation had a negligible impact. Despite of this, it was highly affected by overgrazing(11.3%).
- The table show the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009. 78
- Some people believe that movies should be based on social stigmas while others believe it should be based on real life heros. 89
- Percentage of food budget spent on restaurant meals and home cooking in four years and number of meals per year fast food vs sit-down restaurant meals. 84
- The pie chart shows the main reasons why agricultural land become less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990. 78
- The diagram show the stages and equipments used in the process of cement making and how is used to produce the concrete for building purposes. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...azing, was claimed to be more than third , in the year 1990. Apart from this, the ...
^^
Line 7, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g at 5.5%, and over cultivation at 7.7%, respectively. In contrast, North America...
^^^
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'suffered the least'.
Suggestion: suffered the least
...espectively. In contrast, North America suffered least damage of the total land destruction, w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, third, whereas, apart from, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1092.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29422778403 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635897435897 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2203742286 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.2 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148611823205 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591217166008 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458231713754 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094761040354 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363070801427 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.