The pie chart shows the percentage of women in poverty and the bar chart shows poverty rates by sex and age. They are from the United States in 2008
The pie chart reveals the proportion of women from the United States in 2008, while the bar chart shows the rate of poverty based on sex and gender in the same country and year.
Overall, single women who had no children made up the highest proportion of poverty. While the proportion of poverty by men was lower than women, the group of under 5 ages revealed the highest.
In women poverty groups, single women who had no children accounted for 54% of women in poverty, being the highest compared to others, while the figure for those who had children showed almost a half. However, both of married women with and without dependent children had the minority, at 12% and 8% respectively.
Apart from the previous comparisons, the proportion of poverty by women of age under 5 accounted for more than 15%, slightly higher than men. While the figure for women 18-24 years old showed the same with the former, the men figure had the lower rate by around 5%. However, women figure illustrated poorer than men in the rest figures.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72777777778 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32969955144 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511111111111 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4199151979 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.375 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315575885754 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147891605669 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.172801473853 0.0843802449381 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240345244078 0.15604864568 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.202684384297 0.0819641961636 247% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.