The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the amount of visitors to England who visited four various tourist attractions in Brighton from 1980 to 2010.
Overall, the figures of travellers who visited Pavillion and Pier increased during the period shown, while Art Gallery witnessed a stability and Festival experienced a decline in its proportions.
In 1980, the percentage of visitors to Festival was highest, at 30%, while the figure for Pavillion and Art Gallery was slightly lower at about 22%. Meanwhile, only 10% of tourists who visited Pier in the same period. In 1995, the proportion of Festival and Art Gallery fell to around 25% and 21%, respectively. In contrast, the percentage of visitors who went to Pavilion reached a peak at approximately 50%.
As is shown by the graph, after reached a peak, the visitors to Pavilion then declined sharply to 30% in 2010. Festival’s data remained stable after 2000 and stopped at 28%, which was slightly lower than that of Pavilion, in 2010. Despite some minor fluctuation, the figure of Pier rose to nearly 22% in the same period. However, Art Gallery became the least popular attraction with the proportion of only 9%, 13% lower than that of Pier.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ractions in Brighton from 1980 to 2010. Overall, the figures of travellers who v...
^^^^
Line 2, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...perienced a decline in its proportions. In 1980, the percentage of visitors to F...
^^^^
Line 4, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ximately 50%. As is shown by the graph, after reached a peak, the visitors to Pa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0202020202 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73577052459 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560606060606 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0829869583 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134824687571 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629479658816 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898514551343 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117118498248 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113729855493 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.