The pie charts below show average household expenditure in Hong Kong and Britain in the year 2000.
The given pie charts compare how the proportion of money spent on various household expenses in Hong Kong and Britain during the period of 2000.
We can see that in Hong Kong the greatest proportion of expenditure was on housing, with exactly 32%, while in Britain housing accounted for just 18% of the total.
In contrast, in Britain the expense on other goods and services, the greatest cost, was 36%,compared with 28% in Hong Kong. Food came in second place in Britain, at 22%, while in Hong Kong the actual proportion was higher (27%). In Britain, there was 17% of money spent on transport in one family, but this was much lower in Hong Kong (9%). For the expenditure on clothing, in both regions the smallest percentage contributes to this category.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-16 | Gurveerkaur | 56 | view |
| 2020-11-05 | Charlotte00000 | 100 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | wIsaac | 56 | view |
| 2019-05-24 | Thao16012004 | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-08 | Zukhra | 78 | view |
- The line graph gives information about the number of Iranian Greek and Turkish students who enrolled at Sheffield University between 2005 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 69
- The table below shows how many tourists from five countries visited Australia from 1991 1999 74
- The bar chart shows the relative electricity consumption and cost per year of various household devices Write a 150 word report for a university lecturer explaining the data and making comparisons where relevant 67
- Many students choose to take a gap year before starting university to travel or gain work experience Do you think this is a good idea or a waste of time 61
- In the past most people used to travel to their place of work With increased use of computers the internet and smart phones more and more people are starting to work from home What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development 56