The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie charts below show information about the average of household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. The data is served as percentages to combine five categories while the highest were other goods and services.

As can be seen in the chart, there was 24% of food in Japan which was the third position of the average household expenditures. Other categories were above 20% in housing and other goods and services. Besides, only 6% of healthy care as the lowest household expenses of Japanese People in the year 2010.

However, Housing was the most popular household outcome in Malaysia which was 34%. There was 27% of food and 26% of other goods and services. The same condition on health care category to the both countries where as it stood at under 10% which Malaysian society just spending 3% in household expenditures in 2010. Otherwise, transport in Japan was higher than transport in Malaysia which was 20% and only 10% consumption in Malaysia.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-08-05 nhinhi999 78 view
2022-06-19 Sarina2021 40 view
2022-06-19 Sarina2021 view
2022-03-27 Ahmed Z 81 view
2022-01-20 Vuthungan 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...lth care category to the both countries where as it stood at under 10% which Malaysian s...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, so, third, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93939393939 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64641067105 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527272727273 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8251395311 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5555555556 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247200232796 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119216054856 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.172340659387 0.0843802449381 204% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204761431419 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10883613438 0.0819641961636 133% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.