As we are moving into the 21st century, usage of the empty places in metropolitans is a indeed debateable issue. A number of individual opine that it would be used for the tree plantation rather than for constcution of residential compexes. I oppose this notion to a large extent. My inclination is justified in the enduing paragraphs.
Out of all the arguments to put forward my view point, foremost one is that by the scarcity of land for the development of the housing among the city, the existing infrastructure could become more expensive. One can not only give-up their hope for the well-being but also tired by their economic situation and their desire to own private house is passed away to the descendents due to increased cost. Only rich class of society would afford to live in city while middle class will in real difficulty as the rent is also surged, thus ownership is out of their budget. One recent survey carried out by The Times Of India has concluded that 28% of migration to rural areas from the urban provinces was done after imposing RERA in building construction by Gujarat state government in which developers have not permision to build properties in the diameter of 100 meters of existing premises.
Moreover, accessibility to the workplace for the working professionals is another principle issue. Numerous industries and commercial offices are located in the city center; thus, it will take to much time to reach if one can travell from their house located far away in the sub-urb areas.
However i would not overlook other side too. Nowadays we are living in the highly polluted areas especially, those who are in the congested areas in non-rural side where population density has been contineously surging. They have not any option rather than tree plantation for the pure air to breath. In addtion to this greenary also absorb the traffic and inustrial noise instead of reflecting it back to the atmosphere.
To conclude, either plantation or shelter to the inhabitants is a maticulous decesion. Trees are undoughtadly helpful for the ecology; nonetheless, my explanation says that the cost-effective house is the prime requirement of every human.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...of the empty places in metropolitans is a indeed debateable issue. A number of in...
^
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
... in the city center; thus, it will take to much time to reach if one can travell f...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...located far away in the sub-urb areas. However i would not overlook other side too. No...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 9, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...far away in the sub-urb areas. However i would not overlook other side too. Nowa...
^
Line 4, column 422, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f reflecting it back to the atmosphere. To conclude, either plantation or shelte...
^^^
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s the prime requirement of every human.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, nonetheless, so, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1822.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01928374656 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86470648914 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.7243493696 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.875 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6875 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0930374816647 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.023858916964 0.084324248473 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0268955909819 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0448073407272 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0123335340506 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.