The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010

The represented pictorial data compares the accessibility of the road networks to the city hospital in 2007 and 2010.
Overall, with the expansion and modification in structure, new development is noticed in 2010.
Analysing the picture of 2010, City Hospital was located in the northern part of the map with circular ring road. Enterence of the hospital was taken out from the city road by construction of the hospital road. There were six bus stop exist on both sides of the hospital road before the crossing of city road. Eastern side of the hospital road was provided for the car parking of individuals and staff members.
After a three year of time period some changes had been observed. Public car park was seperated out from mixed car park on the east side of hospital. Two new roundabout was made at the both end of the hospital road. Following this both circle, Bus station was built in between the city road and hosptal on the opposite of staff car park.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'stop' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'stops'.
Suggestion: stops
...f the hospital road. There were six bus stop exist on both sides of the hospital roa...
^^^^
Line 3, column 411, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rking of individuals and staff members. After a three year of time period some change...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 799.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72781065089 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52560848606 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550295857988 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.6107495819 43.030603864 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.9 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.6 5.23603664747 11% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361562353795 0.215688989381 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156563883833 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124844928044 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22553161676 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146364568113 0.0819641961636 179% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.