The given pie charts illustrate the electricity generation for various kinds of energy in New Zealand and Germany between 1980 and 2010.
Overall, while New Zealand generated major electricity for coal, nuclear was generated the most in Germany. In details, New Zealand’s electricity generation stations did not create nuclear. In 1980, there were 127 units in total including 56 units of coal which accounted the most. Natural gas and hydro shared the same figure with 30 units and petroleum was the smallest with 11 units. The progress of electricity in New Zealand witnessed a remarkable growth which rose by 73 units after 30 years. In 2010, coal made up to 150 units which accounted for three quarters in total. While the units of hydro grew to 46, the units of both natural gas and petrolum declined dramatically to 2. In terms of Germany, the total units for the year 1980 was 107, both natural gas and coal were the highest with 28. The followed figures were petroleum and nuclear with 22 units and 20 units respectively. Nuclear power was on top with 155 units in 2010, while the rest aspects saw a remarkable decrease. The figures of hydro and natural gas are similar with only 2 units.
- Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The diagram below shows the multistage production of pears as canned fruits Write a report for a university lecturer the process below 78
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010 56
- The plans below show a student room for two students and a student room for one student at an Australian university 67
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85507246377 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50472726296 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 17.7662288877 43.030603864 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.75 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.416666666667 5.23603664747 8% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220490417476 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104074798142 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141723981066 0.0843802449381 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219016943794 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.169351479813 0.0819641961636 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.