The pie charts below show energy production in Spain in 2008 and 2017. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the changes in different sources of energy production in Spain in two separate years- 2008 and 2017.
Overall, the production of fossil fuels such as gas, oil and coal drooped in 9 years time period. However, other energy sources like nuclear saw an increase in production.
In 2008, fossil fuels were the largest part of the production. The number of fossil fuels produced stood at %77 of the total. By 2017, this figure declined to 63%. In 2008, coal was the most produced energy source, standing at 28% of the total resources. It saw the largest drop in 2017 to 17%. Just like coal, oil saw a decrease in production from %27 to 23% in 9 years. On the other hand, gas production slightly grew by 1%.
Nuclear energy, renewable and other energy sources were lees produced in 2008. These saw significant growth in production in 2017. Other types of energy sources doubled the amount of production from 3% to %6 in 2017. Renewable energy also increased from 9% to 16%. Nuclear energy too grew from 11% to 17%.
- The graph below represents the total exports of clothing from 3 different countries over a time period 78
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and the present 73
- A knowledge of maths is not important for most jobs nowadays To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement 85
- Some people think that in the modern world we are more dependent on each other while others think that people have become more independent Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- The pie charts below show energy production in Spain in 2008 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...17. Renewable energy also increased from 9% to 16%. Nuclear energy too grew from ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 865.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72677595628 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42955023083 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540983606557 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.096657214 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 57.6666666667 112.824112599 51% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.2 22.9334400587 53% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.26666666667 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194533488962 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719774087937 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625423826136 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144957158395 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0833541073518 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.9 13.2329268293 52% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.68 61.2550243902 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.4 10.3012195122 43% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.27 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.4329268293 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.