Most modern families have both parents working and as a result, children spend less and less time with their parents. What is the reason for this? What solutions can you suggest?
In our modern society, children have less time with their family since their parents are working. Spending quality time with their parents is really important for children's' development. In this essay, I will discuss the reasons for this issue and I will suggest solutions.
To begin with, parents need to work to provide the needs of their children. Nowadays, living expenses such as rent, electricity and gas are high. People often struggle to pay these with just one salary, therefore, both the mother and the father work. One solution to this issue would be that the government could give financial support to people with children. For example, in Germany, the government gives €500 per children to families in need. With this added support, people would not worry about their finances and would spend more time with their children.
Another reason why parents spend less time with their children is that women think that if they quit their job for taking care of their children, they will face difficulties to find a job in the future. It is true that work-life is competitive and it is difficult to find employment after a long break. Employers should be understanding and consider the situation of women while hiring. This would help new mothers to feel more secure and they would quit their job without worrying about their future career.
In conclusion, with both parents working full time the time they spend with their children is very limited. They should find a way to balance their work and personal life since it is important for children's' development to spend quality time with their parents.
- Most modern families have both parents working and as a result children spend less and less time with their parents What is the reason for this What solutions can you suggest 56
- The only reason to work hard is to earn money To what extend do you agree or disagree 56
- In some countries it is now illegal to reject someone applying for a job because of his or her age Do you think this is a positive or negative development 61
- The two maps show an island before and after the construction of touristic facilities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- It is certainly difficult for people in cities to do physical exercise Why is this the case What can be done to solve this problem 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...nt after a long break. Employers should be understanding and consider the situation of women whi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 42, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...n conclusion, with both parents working full time the time they spend with their children...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, really, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98148148148 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38853284743 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525925925926 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4568773743 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6666666667 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420652912602 0.244688304435 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156646135289 0.084324248473 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115952691413 0.0667982634062 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.300379521114 0.151304729494 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0976503394887 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...nt after a long break. Employers should be understanding and consider the situation of women whi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 42, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...n conclusion, with both parents working full time the time they spend with their children...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, really, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98148148148 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38853284743 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525925925926 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4568773743 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6666666667 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420652912602 0.244688304435 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156646135289 0.084324248473 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115952691413 0.0667982634062 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.300379521114 0.151304729494 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0976503394887 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.