The pie charts below show exports between the US and Vietnam.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate export between 2 distinct countries, namely US and Vietnam.
Overall, it can seem that the most valuable category is aircraft parts that transfer from the US to Vietnam. Moreover, the kinds of freight that play a crucial role in each country are utterly distinct.
Similarly, both coffee and aircraft parts exported by Vietnam and the US order occupy nearly half of the total.
In Vietnam, the number of bucks from exporting coffee is by far the highest, at 23 million dollars, while the figures for rice and seafood are both sharply lower, at 4.3 and 4.4 million dollars sequentially. At the same time, fruit and vegetables contribute 16 million dollars in the entire exports, in contrast, the figures for garments are 2 million dollars. In addition, Vietnam received only 2 million dollars of other goods.
In the USA, the responses indicate that "aircraft parts" is the most valuable category, at 72 million dollars. Noticeably, the quantity of money received from exporting cotton is twice as much as exporting cars. The same thing happened between machinery and fertilizer. And machinery contributes higher bucks to the total of all categories. Remarkably, the total money from other merchandise provides more than all categories except airplane crafts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-26 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-24 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 78 | view |
| 2024-06-24 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-24 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-24 | Zahid6400 | 78 | view |
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion Give reasons fo 84
- The graph below shows food consumption in Australia between 1950 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 56
- The chart below shows the distribution of different income groups in cities and regional centres of Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant 73
- The graph below shows food consumption in Australia between 1950 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 68
- The pie charts below show exports between the US and Vietnam Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, moreover, similarly, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1092.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27536231884 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7639859251 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589371980676 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0820895324 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132652516458 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579312212296 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799248111103 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108939681126 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.096472212286 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.