The pie charts below show the percentage of housing owned and rented in the UK in 1991 and 2007.
Summarize the information by describing the main features of the charts and making comparisons where appropriate
The charts illustrates the number of houses which are rented and possessed in the UK from 1991 to 2007.
It is apparent that there are four kinds of houses' status, which the figure for houses in total grew gradually during the period. Clearly, the proportion of houses which are possessed, was the highest numbers compared to the number of social houses in the same period.
As can be seen from the charts, over a half of UK citizens owned their house in 1991 with figures ranking on the highest position. In the next sixteen years, the percentage of house owners increased to nearly third-fourth . The figure for private renting houses was joint-highest which revealed a-third of houses in 1991, was as double as that figure in 2007.
Moving on to others kinds of houses, the proportion of houses which supported for disadvantages underwent a slightly fall from a-tenth to minor percent during the period . Having been remained the similar trend, the number of private renting houses was roughly a fifth.
- In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen Is it positive or negative development 73
- The pie charts below show the percentage of housing owned and rented in the UK in 1991 and 2007 Summarize the information by describing the main features of the charts and making comparisons where appropriate 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'illustrate'.
Suggestion: illustrate
The charts illustrates the number of houses which are rented a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sessed in the UK from 1991 to 2007. It is apparent that there are four kinds...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sed, was the highest numbers compared to the number of social houses in the same ...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f social houses in the same period. As can be seen from the charts, over a h...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 222, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... owners increased to nearly third-fourth . The figure for private renting houses w...
^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s as double as that figure in 2007. Moving on to others kinds of houses, the...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch supported for disadvantages underwent a slightly fall from a-tenth to minor pe...
^^
Line 13, column 108, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('fall') instead of another adjective.
... supported for disadvantages underwent a slightly fall from a-tenth to minor percent during th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 171, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...tenth to minor percent during the period . Having been remained the similar trend,...
^^
Line 13, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Having been remained the similar trend, the number of private renting houses was...
^^^^
Line 13, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er of private renting houses was roughly a fifth.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05294117647 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50825435582 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547058823529 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.2251805979 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.375 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.625 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188372402888 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0996728369127 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779313481203 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145594695422 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931035220091 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.