The pie charts below show the percentage of housing owned and rented in the UK in 1991 and 2007.
Summarize the information by describing the main features of the charts and making comparisons where appropriate.
The given diagram is an illustration of the percentage of housing owned and rented in the United Kingdom between the years 1991 and 2007. A quick overview of the pie charts shows a significant increase in the total number of homes, with a specific surge in owned housing within a span of 16 years.
Perhaps the most striking feature of the pie chart, owned homes made a statement with time. In the 90s, almost a quarter of 22 million homes were occupied by socially rented houses. However, with the addition of 5 million homes over the years, the number of homeowners exhibited drastic expansion by a proportion of 10%. This led to a consequent loss of socially rented homes, which had dropped to 17% by the time 2007 rolled in. Social housing also took a hit and became quite unpopular as the years progressed, with a drop from 6% to 2%.
The only constants between both the years are the homes which were rented privately. Private renting has maintained a consistent proportion of 11% and always been a more common choice than social housing.
- Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The bar chart below shows the number of houses built per year in two cities Derby and Nottingham Between 2000 and 2009 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 73
- In some countries only a few young people go to classical music concerts or play classical music Why Should young people be encouraged to attend and learn more 56
- he diagram below shows how Olive Oil is manufactured Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 61
- In some countries only a few young people go to classical music concerts or play classical music Why Should young people be encouraged to attend and learn more 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71195652174 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52678818936 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603260869565 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.1819236641 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.3333333333 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205896782433 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822932592152 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746284049945 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143116567798 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0945813034617 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.