The pie charts below show the percentage of time working adults spent on different activities in a particular country in 1958 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The pie charts below show the percentage of time working adults spent on different activities in a particular country in 1958 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The pie graphs demonstrate the proportion of expenditure in time working adults on diverse activities in a specific nation between 1958 and 2008.

In general, it is clear that the majority of working time that adults spent on working during 1958 and 2008. In contrast, the least amount of time belonged to travel to work and other interests or playing sports.

Looking at the pie charts for more details, we can see that adults spent the highest portion of working time for working element with 33% in 1958. Standing at the second position was sleeping by 32%. Travel to work was witnessed at the smallest percentage with only 2%. In addition, adults utilized 6% and 8% their time on other interest or playing sports and relaxing at home respectively in the same time.

As can be seen from the remaining categories, in 2008 working still stood at the first position for time working with 42%. Moreover, the amount of sleeping time was less than that in 1958, by 25%. During this period, the least figure for adults to spend was going out (with friends/family) at 6%. Travel to working and other interests or playing sports stood at the same portion with 8%

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-01-21 honguyenlily 73 view
2023-11-03 tracywu 73 view
2023-02-01 Trần Ánh Vy 67 view
2019-07-16 namra 86 view
Essays by user honguyenlily :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, moreover, second, still, in addition, in contrast, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76237623762 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4456247231 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514851485149 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.2086408743 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4545454545 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3636363636 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 5.23603664747 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223560312078 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102277684498 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807094323383 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176034513252 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476675982214 0.0819641961636 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.