The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
The given pie charts present the status of energy production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
Overall, it can be observed that the development of electricity from different sources in Australia and France has been compared in 2000 with the status of electricity production in 1980 by them.
In the first two pie charts are presenting units of electricity produced by different source such as coal, oil, natural gas, hydro power and nuclear power in Australia in 1980 and 2000 respectively. In 1980, total electricity production was 100 units only. Out of total electricity 50 units was produced from coal. least contribution of electricity by oil. Similarly, natural gas and hydro power electricity was equal of 20 units each. However, the major contributions of electricity was coal i.e. 130 units out of 170 units in 2000. Second highest contribution of power was hydro power which was 38 units and rest of 4 units was contributed by oil and natural gas in Australia.
The second two pie charts shows the contribution on electricity by different source of of fuel in France. Only 90 units of electricity was produced in 1980. Out of total 50 units was produced from coal and natural gas equally. Similarly, 20 units produced by oil, 15 units produced from Nuclear power and remaining from hydro power. However, the major source of electricity in France was nuclear power which contributes 126 units out of 180 units of electricity. Oil and coal were second major source of electricity in France. The electricity contribution of natural gas and hydro power was only 2 units each.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | happyhappy | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | kalampeet | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | kalampeet | 56 | view |
- The given trend line explains consumption of fish and different kind of meet items in a Europian country from 1979 to 2004. 73
- he chart bellow shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. 67
- The given trend line explains consumption of fish and different kind of meet items in a Europian country from 1979 to 2004. 73
- An informal letter 89
- The table illustrates the nature of national consumer expenditure in Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey on three categories of consumer product in 2002. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and France in 1980 and 2000. Overall, it can be observed that the development ...
^^
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Least
...ricity 50 units was produced from coal. least contribution of electricity by oil. Sim...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the least'.
Suggestion: the least
...ricity 50 units was produced from coal. least contribution of electricity by oil. Sim...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: of
...tion on electricity by different source of of fuel in France. Only 90 units of electr...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, similarly, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 965.302439024 139% => OK
No of words: 270.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98148148148 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8375325938 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.366666666667 0.547539520022 67% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.0 283.868780488 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.605391319 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0625 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.875 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4375 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407074776001 0.215688989381 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185508955949 0.103423049105 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12835296027 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.350102334707 0.15604864568 224% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106710277313 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.36 8.06136585366 79% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.