The pie charts compare the proportion of monthly household income allocated for different things in low income and high-income members of a European nation.
The pie charts compare the proportion of monthly household income allocated for different things in low-income and high-income members of a European nation.
Overall, as can be seen, the vulnerable people spent roughly more than a half of their salary for good and drink and fuel bills, however, the prosperous people devoted more fund for miscellaneous and recreation and far less for food and fuel.
Looking at the destitute group it is crystal clear that food and drink, fuel bills and miscellaneous constituting higher percentage compared with other items with 29%, 24%, and 18% respectively. Conversely, restaurants and clothing making 4% and 5% expenditure respectively. Transport and culture have approximately the same number around 10% of the total budget.
Regarding the affluent chart, the expenditure is largely reversed with the exception of clothing with 6%. In other words, recreation and miscellaneous have higher than 40% of the total. This followed by transport, food and drink and hotels making 16%, 15%, and 12% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-04 | Mohammad Khaleghi Esfahani | 89 | view |
- The layout demonstrates a health center in two separate era and the changes which had happened by now. 78
- The illustration demonstrates the various stages undertaken in order to produce leather products. 78
- The pie charts compare online sales in four main areas for retail sectors in Newzealand in two different time spans. 61
- The bar chart compares the volume of male and female participating in different evening courses, namely drama, painting, sculpture, and language; while the pie chart shows the ages of these attendees. 89
- The table compares social and economic factors based on the United Nation (UN) statistics in four nations, namely Canada, Japan, Peru, and Zaire in 1994. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 67, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...rt, the expenditure is largely reversed with the exception of clothing with 6%. In other words, recre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, if, look, regarding, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44785276074 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00621009046 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650306748466 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3888872082 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309844418509 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137710122674 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.326374108591 0.0843802449381 387% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271106014356 0.15604864568 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.421037204055 0.0819641961636 514% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.