The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The information about several ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia is illustrated in pie charts.

Overall, using online for accessing the news in Australia is more common, compared with people in Canada. However, reading news in not specified ways is unusual in both countries.

As per data, the proportion of Australians who liked reading news on the Internet is most popular, breaking the record as the highest percentage with just above a half. Also, the way of accessing the news on Television is still preferred for them, being the second place with more than a third. Meanwhile, Other counterparts of seeing the news show the minority proportion.

When it comes to Canadians, those are more comfortable using the TV to access the news with the biggest proportion of two-fifths, this followed by online ways with well under 40%. Another figure can be seen from those who are using a printed book for reading the news with less than a fifth. This contrasted to radio and not specified ways, being the lower proportion with 7% and 3% respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-05-08 tr_h.20 84 view
2023-10-08 RIYA MODI 78 view
2023-07-16 baotrammm 60 view
2023-07-15 kien150199 view
2023-07-15 ililmaidatuz 78 view
Essays by user tegarangkasa :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, still, third, well, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96666666667 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69175696443 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9345775803 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3333333333 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197585044445 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100584864842 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100167441048 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175355685747 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110027062489 0.0819641961636 134% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.