“The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia.
The pie chart below gives information about five different ways to get news from the Canadian and Australian people.
In general, it can be seen that television and online have the highest percentage, while both Canadian and Australians use less radio and print to access the news. The two nations show broadly similar patterns.
16% of people use online to search for information via more in Australia than in Canada, at 52% and 26%, respectively. The proportion of Australians using television to get the news is 37%, while Canada only accounts for 40% of the total percentage on the chart.
Radio and print media are the least popular ways of getting news across. The proportion of using print in Canada is twice as much as in Australia, at 14% and 7%, respectively. People accessing the news via radio in Canada is 7%, and 5% more than Australians. Finally, not specified contributes a small section on the chart, at 3% in Canada and 2% in Australia.
- The table below shows the salaries of secondary high school teachers in 2009 78
- Many people have a close relationship with their pets These people treat their birds cats or other animals as members of their family In your opinion as such relationships good Why or Why not 84
- The pie charts below show the percentage of housing owned and rented in the UK in 1991 and 2007 70
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for th building 78
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
The pie chart below gives information about five diff...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 795.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81818181818 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75378360635 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587878787879 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7005696549 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3333333333 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359018580988 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14108533787 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698546928573 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206385030291 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0958101802249 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.