The pie charts give information about visitors to the US from different countries from 1988 to 1992.
The pie charts compare the percentage of travelers to the US from four different countries over a 4-year period starting from 1988.
Overall, the proportion of Canadians occupied the majority of visitors to American, although this rate tended to decline each year. By contrast, the figure of Chineses increased significantly.
In 1988, the percentage of travelers from Canada accounted for more than half of the total tourists in the United States, roughly double the rate of Mexicos, nearly 5 times of China visitors and other countries. After 2 years, a significant growth to more quarter was seen the proportion of guests from China. In contrast, the figure of Canadians visiting the US witnessed a considerable decline by 10% to 43%. The rate of tourists from Mexico and other countries also decreased slowly to a fifth and 9% respectively.
On other hand, the statistic of guests to the US from China and Mexico rose slightly to 30% and 26% respectively in 1992. Besides, there was a decrease by approximately 5% in the rate of travelers from Canada and other countries at the end of this period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-06 | VietAn97 | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-10 | thảo vy | 67 | view |
| 2020-11-15 | Ajantha J | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | kidosince2000 | 74 | view |
| 2019-07-01 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
- The Chart shows expected city visits by country of origin for 2018 Thousands Year 84
- The pie charts give information about visitors to the US from different countries from 1988 to 1992 73
- The table shows the percentage of students giving a good ratings for different aspects of a university in China in 2000 2005 2010
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010
- In the developed world average life expectancy is increasing What problems will this cause for individuals and society Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of aging populations 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00540540541 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86483426807 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5960402242 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.888888889 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327053041809 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127335424478 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12198623702 0.0843802449381 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213581547823 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146980862971 0.0819641961636 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.