The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries: China and India
The graph depicts the information about the foods % consumed in the world, compared to China and India over the period. Overall, it was immediately apparent that there was a largest percentage of processed food consumed in the world including in China and India compared to other foods.
In 2008, the processed food had a greater proportion in the world, India, and China, with 41 %, 39%, 34% respectively, where the figure for the world was the maximum recorded. In China, fewer animal food was consumed, only at 19 %. While that in the world and India, food for animal about 26% and 27%, a much higher than In China.
On the other hand, In the world and India, the figure for Nuts and Seeds had smallest proportion of food consumption, accounting for 4%, 11% each. In addition, the consumption of vegetables in the world and China was higher, compared to India, with 29% (In the world, 32% (in China), and only 23 % (In India).
- The bar graph below depicts the information about four different transportmodes used by people in a European City from 1960 to 2000. 78
- The bar chart below shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities Toronto Madrid Kuala Lumpur and Amman 66
- The table below shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondaryschool types between 2000 and 2009. 84
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example, through cell phone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening. 56
- The graphs show changes in spending habits of people in the UK between 1971 and 2001 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...was immediately apparent that there was a largest percentage of processed food co...
^
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the smallest'.
Suggestion: had the smallest
...nd India, the figure for Nuts and Seeds had smallest proportion of food consumption, account...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 761.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6975308642 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51369452856 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512345679012 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7687191195 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.714285714 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354420712405 0.215688989381 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194838817038 0.103423049105 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691957997272 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271377451798 0.15604864568 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0121597499532 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.