The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in the year 2009.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the amount of electricity generated in Germany and France in 2009. The units are measured in percentages.
Overall, the quantity of electricity produced by Germany is greater than the amount that is generated by France. It is evident that more than half of Germany's electricity is conventional Thermal whereas France highly depended on Nuclear energy. Furthermore, Germany had created electricity through various renewable resources.
To begin, 59.6% of Germany's electric power is generated through coal, whereas, France produced only 10.3% using the same resource. 23% of electricity is generated through Nuclear energy by Germany, whereas, more than three-fourths of power is generated through Nuclear energy by France.
In terms of Renewable resources, Germany had 17.4% comprised of total production. This includes production from sources like Biomass making 39.3%, Wind making 36.9%, Hydroelectricity making 17.7%, and Solar power making 6.1%.On the other hand, France had 80.5% provided from Hydroelectricity,10.5% from Wind, 8.1% from Biomass and a negligible amount of 0.9% from Solar energy.
Both countries did not use Geothermal energy to produce electricity
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008. 61
- The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in the year 2009.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years. 73
- The table shows information and predictions regarding the change in the percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries. 73
- Some people think that more money should be spent on protecting endangered species while others think it is a waste of valuable money.What is your opinion? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...king 17.7%, and Solar power making 6.1%.On the other hand, France had 80.5% provid...
^^
Line 9, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Geothermal energy to produce electricity
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, so, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1028.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84090909091 4.92477711251 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10141929653 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 67.4252178343 43.030603864 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.8 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276828536835 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113001836616 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875971911287 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154293315321 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0780328550795 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 11.4140731707 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.