The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in the year 2009.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart illustrates the electricity produced from all origins and reuseables in two countries germany and france in 2009.
Overall, it can be seen that, three different types of sources value given in percentages. while , electricity generation is shown in Billion kWh. germany generated more electricity compare to france.For this generation it used three types of sources like conventional thermal, renewables and nuclear.
To start with, conventional thermal it used 59.6% in germany , but it had a drastic fall to 10.3% in france. In constrast, portion of nuclear it increased rapidlly from 23.0% to 76.0% for germany to france. renewables percentages are in between 13 t0 18 for both countries.
In germany renewables are Biomass and wind cover 39.3% and 36.9% respectively. while in france only Hydroelectric only occupied 80.5%. As well, as solar value it decreased slowly fro 6.1% to 0.9% for germany to france . Finally geothermal remained constant for both the countries.
- An increasing number of professionals, such as doctors and teachers, are leaving their own poorer countries to work in developed countries. What problems do this cause? What solutions can you suggest to deal with this situation? 84
- The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in the year 2009.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in the year 2009.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The charts below give information about levels of education in Glasgow, a city in Scotland, in 2010. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntries germany and france in 2009. Overall, it can be seen that, three diff...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 92, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
... of sources value given in percentages. while , electricity generation is shown in Bi...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 92, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “while” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... of sources value given in percentages. while , electricity generation is shown in Bi...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 97, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ources value given in percentages. while , electricity generation is shown in Bill...
^^
Line 9, column 135, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a Billion'.
Suggestion: A Billion
...le , electricity generation is shown in Billion kWh. germany generated more electricit...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 148, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Germany
...ity generation is shown in Billion kWh. germany generated more electricity compare to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... shown in Billion kWh. germany generated more electricity compare to france.For t...
^^
Line 9, column 202, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...ted more electricity compare to france.For this generation it used three types of ...
^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l thermal, renewables and nuclear. To start with, conventional thermal it u...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 61, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ntional thermal it used 59.6% in germany , but it had a drastic fall to 10.3% in f...
^^
Line 17, column 208, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Renewables
...m 23.0% to 76.0% for germany to france. renewables percentages are in between 13 t0 18 for...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tween 13 t0 18 for both countries. In germany renewables are Biomass and wi...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 80, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...ind cover 39.3% and 36.9% respectively. while in france only Hydroelectric only occup...
^^^^^
Line 25, column 80, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “while” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ind cover 39.3% and 36.9% respectively. while in france only Hydroelectric only occup...
^^^^^
Line 25, column 180, Rule ID: FOR_FRO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for'?
Suggestion: for
...ell, as solar value it decreased slowly fro 6.1% to 0.9% for germany to france . Fi...
^^^
Line 25, column 218, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...y fro 6.1% to 0.9% for germany to france . Finally geothermal remained constant fo...
^^
Line 25, column 221, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...ro 6.1% to 0.9% for germany to france . Finally geothermal remained constant for both t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, well, while, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 863.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56774193548 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99824362408 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.645161290323 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.2277688529 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 17.0 1.69756097561 1001% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235686365124 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836791735995 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840004213596 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154260608271 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0857822612769 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.73 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.