The plans below show the ground floor of a library in 2001 and how it was developed in 2009. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps illustrate how the ground floor of a library had changed from 2001 to2009.
Overall, the layout had undergone many substantial developments over 8 years, especially the appearance of many areas for different kinds of books.
Regarding the left corner of the map, there were history book shelves and self-help book shelves put in 2001, before being divided into five smaller areas including history, fiction, self-help, kitchen, economics and laws in 2009. In 2001, an area for fiction books was arranged on the top of the map, which was extended twice and replaced by children’s books and a children’s area was designed opposite to that in the next 8 years.
Looking to another side of the map, shelves for newspaper and periodicals were converted to films and DVDs. Opposite to it, computers appeared and eight tables were changed to four longer tables in 2009. Lastly, the librarian’s desk and stairs remained unchanged over 8 years.
- Task 1 The two bar charts below show the proportion of 14 16 year old students studying a foreign language in an English speaking country and the top three foreign languages Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make c 78
- Task 2 Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Task 2 Many people believe that watching a live performance is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or expe 73
- Task 1 The percentage of people who were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting this main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Task 1 The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality both actual and target what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve and the number of complaints from passengers Summarise the information b 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, lastly, look, regarding, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 802.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14102564103 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67835210899 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634615384615 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8468021619 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.666666667 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113651229761 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061172641758 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673108133218 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0801488426592 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731680499163 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.