• Task 2: Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school. What are the reasons? What could be done to solve this problem?
Paying attention at school is an arduous task for many students. That problem is rooted in both student and teaching. However, there are some solutions that I will mention below.
It is incontrovertible that the lackness of discipline, concentration ability and teaching method contribute to the distraction of students at school. To begin with, students are too young so their discipline and concentration are not high. Because they are very curious about the world at a young age, they are easily attracted to others such as gossip, toys and so on. Moreover, the awareness of listening to teachers and being quiet is not formed in many students and that requires a long period to have. In addition, it is a traditional teaching method that makes children bored, unconscious at school. In many cases, students passively get knowledge by reading books, listening from teachers, which is dull and hinder the study independence of students. And the curriculum is unsuitable, theoretical and overburdened.
However, people also come up with some effective ways in order to prevent this phenomenon. First, thanks to the appearance of technology gadgets, there are some innovative approaches to teaching. For example, teachers can let children learn by themselves through videos, google, apps so that will arouse their curiousness, dependence. Second, parents and schools should focus on educating children to have good behavior, concentration. For instance, with playing educational games, the concentration ability of children can improve significantly. In school, if children have lessons about morality, they are inclined to apply it in study.
In conclusion, the lackness of study skills and unreasonable teaching lead to the distraction of some students in school but people can resort to the change in curriculum and the focus in teaching morality and concentration for students to solve that.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-04 | hien3112 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | ngo viet | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | Nguyen Hai Dang | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | ngango56 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Anne020304 | 89 | view |
- Task 1 The charts below show the percentages of men and women aged 60 64 in employment in four countries in 1970 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Task 2 Some people want governments to spend money looking for life on other planets Others however think this is a waste of public money when there are so many problems on earth Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- Task 1 The two bar charts below show the proportion of 14 16 year old students studying a foreign language in an English speaking country and the top three foreign languages Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make c 78
- Task 1 The plan below shows a school in 1985 and the school now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Task 1 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Paying attention at school is an arduous...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...centration for students to solve that.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in many cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44932432432 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06833951175 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564189189189 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.4326725441 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8823529412 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4117647059 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.52941176471 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212933237952 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656240641565 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06752564245 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141824671989 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696106075289 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.