The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the samepark today.

Essay topics:

The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the samepark today.

The plans given demonstrate a public park when it was first opened in 1920 and the condition of the same park today.

It is clear that the overall area of the park is the same as it was in 1920 with significant changes in certain aspects. The place where te Stage for musicians used to be is now Amphitheatre for concerts. There were also four separate seating places close to the stage which are not anymore. Furthermore, there were three rose gardens in 1920, whereas now there are two. One rose garden is at the centre of the park replacing the fountain and the other is at the corner of Arnold Avenue where it used to be. There are seating arrangements around the rose garden at the centre now. The other rose garden at the Arnold Avenue end of the park has been replaced by a café, beside which is the children’s play area where the pond for water plants was in 1920. A new water feature has been introduced at the place of the glasshouse. Also an underground car parking has been built at the right corner of the park where there were seats before, near the Elton Street.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-21 Shahrear59 67 view
Essays by user Shahrear59 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 454, Rule ID: THE_NN_AND_THE_NN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'are'?
Suggestion: are
...rk replacing the fountain and the other is at the corner of Arnold Avenue where it...
^^
Line 3, column 833, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...roduced at the place of the glasshouse. Also an underground car parking has been bui...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 7.0 286% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.445 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36067257365 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5828825445 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.9 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191679528733 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855413656151 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151280557486 0.0843802449381 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.30389846439 0.15604864568 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.223937345228 0.0819641961636 273% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.53 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.