The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps illustrate a number of changes which took place in Grange park from 1920 to present.
Overall, Grange park has witnessed dramatic changes with the most noticeable change being the construction of entertainment facilities such as a café and children’s play area.
In 1920, visitors could enter the park from the Northern entrance on Arnold Avenue or the Southern one on Eldon Street but now the park has had a new entrance from an underground car park. A new water feature has been built in place of the old glasshouse to the west of the southern entrance. In addition, the fountain was located at the center of the park, with the large stage for musicians on the left. At the present, the former has been replaced by a rose garden surrounded by many seats while the latter has been demolished to give room for an amphitheater for concerts.
Previously, there were two gardens of roses situated in the west and east of the southern park and one on the right of the northern entry with many seats placed next to them but recently only the one on the north of the amphitheater existed. Besides, the garden and pond for water planted on the top right corner has been substituted by a cafe and a playground for children, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-28 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-28 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
| 2024-01-28 | Wardiati Yusuf | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-30 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | Kshitij Kasabekar | 67 | view |
- We are becoming increasingly dependent on computer based technology How do you think it will change in the future Is it good for us to rely so much on computers 84
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 84
- We are becoming increasingly dependent on computer based technology How do you think it will change in the future Is it good for us to rely so much on computers 84
- The chart below shows the movement of people from rural to urban areas in three countries and predictions for future years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant The line graph compares USA Canada and Mexico in terms of the proportion of people using internet from 1999 to 2009 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, so, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1031.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68636363636 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65608221395 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.4137304577 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.875 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114973088976 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522618255131 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445214357891 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0713304026468 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333565627613 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.