the plans below show a public park when it was first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The plans below illustrates the upgrades which were made to Grange Park today compare to its original’s construction in 1920.

At the first glance, quite a few extraodinary changes have been done to the place. Both of the park entrances are left untouch as well as the mini rose gaden on the right hand side of Arnold Avenue’s port. However, the benches of seat that used to be spreaded about the park are now placed together around the centered grand rose garden which were the result of the disappearance of two smaller rose gardens situated on the left of each gates. On the left hand side if you are entering the gate on Eldon Street, the stage for musician is now widen and built up to an amphitheatre for concerts.
Moving across the park from the theatre, pass the seating area in the middle, there is marvelous water feature at the right South corner of the park that onced was the glasshouse. Looking up to the NorthWest of the plan, directly opposite the water feature is the Children’s play area on the ground of pond for water plants back in 1920. Right next to it is the Park café. A brand new facility has also recently been built into the park is the entrance underground car park located on the right hand side of the entrance on Eldon Street, just under the water feature.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... of the park entrances are left untouch as well as the mini rose gaden on the right hand s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 543, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'widened'.
Suggestion: widened
...n Street, the stage for musician is now widen and built up to an amphitheatre for con...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, so, well, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1069.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56837606838 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38784895488 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568376068376 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7909312879 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.777777778 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183648823302 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080893150746 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561638257532 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137275247465 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590745609825 0.0819641961636 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.