The maps compare the outlay of the public Park, called the Grange Park, between 1920 and the present time.
Overall, it is noticeable that there are a lot of modifications inside the park apart from the unchanged entrance areas in north and south parts of it.
According to the 1920 image of the Park, there was a fountain at the centre of the park, but today it is removed, and, instead, the rose garden is constructed that is surrounded by seats from all four sides of it. Stage for musicians, which was located next to the fountain, was renovated into a big amphitheatre for concerts. Additionally, two rose gardens, one of which was situated beside the south entrance and the other to the east of north entrance, are eliminated and a new café is built in the place of the latter.
Regarding the glasshouse located to the north-east of the park, water feature replaced it according to the current day map. Pond for plants is also removed, by inserting the children’s play area instead. While the two entrances, one facing the Arnold avenue and the other facing the Eldon street, remained at the same places, the new entrance is added in the underground car park.
- The table below shows the changes in some household types in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The car is possibly the most convenient and popular way of getting from A to B However due to its impact on environment and the risk it poses to pedestrians and motorists government should take urgent steps to reduce our dependency on this mode of transpo 89
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 85
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ark, between 1920 and the present time. Overall, it is noticeable that there are...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74146341463 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58704041489 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560975609756 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8912007127 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189013232324 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809137056271 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630675508073 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119201855537 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051040052877 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.