The plans below show a small theatre In 2010, and the same theatre in 2012.
The plans given depict the modernization in the layouts of a small theater over a period of two years from 2010 to 2012.
It is noticeable from the plans that during the research period, the stage was widened. Additionally, the dressing room was relocated to make way for the introduction of a corridor.
In 2010, visitors could enter the theater through the main door situated at the bottom of the layout, which was flanked by a ticket office to the left and a café to the right. Likewise, an admin office was located next to the ticket one, whereas there were three doors leading to the auditorium, which was in the center of the theater.
To 2012, while the main door and the auditorium still existed in the same positions where they used to be in 2010, the ticket office was relocated to the bottom-right corner. Meanwhile, the location of the admin office underwent a change to the position next to auditorium to give way to the erection of a restaurant, followed by the expansion of the stage, forcing the dressing room and the storage to move to the top left and top right areas respectively. At the same time, showers and the corridor were constructed in order to meet the demands of customers.
- The diagrams below show the coastal village of Seaville in 1980 and 2010 73
- Some people believe that a crime is a result of social problems and poverty while others think that crime is a result of a bad person s nature Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Governments should ban dangerous sports Others think that people should have the freedom to do any sport activity Discuss both sides and give your opinion 89
- Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country rather than works of the other parts in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The chart shows the proportion of people in a UK survey carried out in three different years who said they were interested in certain sports 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64953271028 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63584955112 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523364485981 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.387162336 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.375 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110926974486 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553626381928 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633626183259 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0823994144846 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681801964296 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.