The plans show an office in a university in 2005 and the same office now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The plans show an office in a university in 2005 and the same office now.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The map plan gives information about a university office in 2005 and now.

Overall, it can be seen that the office was very unorganized in 2005 whereas now it seems more spacious and organized with more important facilities.

To begin with, there are many significant changes that took place. Firstly, in 2005 the university office looks very confusing because at that time it had too many desks to approach, but now it is easy to go either straight from the entrance where they joined 4 desks together and the office which is located on the northwest side of the map. Secondly, there were only two armchairs for the people who waited, but now they have made it more convenient with an additional sofa and now it is just the left side from the entrance.

However, one of the major and required changes that happened now is that they have installed a water cooler and the coffee machine next to the waiting area, and the notice board is also moved from the east sidewall to the south sidewall.

Votes
Average: 9.5 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-11 hahoaan 84 view
2024-10-08 nobitaa 78 view
2024-10-04 hien3112 78 view
2024-07-07 Zahid6400 61 view
2024-05-14 123456abcxyz 11 view
Essays by user abashwini174@g… :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the office was very unorganized in 2005 whereas now it seems more spacious and o...
^^
Line 5, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ficant changes that took place. Firstly, in 2005 the university office looks very...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, whereas, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 825.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66101694915 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36823596941 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621468926554 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.8388648998 43.030603864 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.5 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.0 5.23603664747 286% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224401385561 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12060943958 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118529268518 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160217089529 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122005257391 0.0819641961636 149% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.34 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.