The diagram below show the riverpark area of 20 years ago and the river park area now. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The pair of maps illustrate the comparison of today's riverpark area and the riverpark area of 20 years ago. It is clear that the infrastructure of riverpark has developed over 20 years.
Looking at the first map in more detail, it is evident that in 20 years ago, a curved estuary road was in the north side of the park. In south part, there was a railway track. The railway track was connected with the estuary road by Sunset Street. West and east, both parts of the park was covered by trees. Factory and shops were just beside the left side of the sun road. Sun road was U shaped and in the middle of this road, there was a petrol station, library, and doctor's surgery. Besides the right side of sun road, there was a college along with estuary road.
Turning to the second map, it is clear that radical changes can be seen in the present-day river park. A railway station has been made on the southwest side railway track.
In the northeast side of Estuary Road, a marina has been made. Factory has replaced by supermarket and shops are almost double now. Bird house has been built in the east side of the jungle. A pedestrian road has been made on the sun road along with a supermarket.
Overall, it can be seen that the present river park is more well organized and developed than 20 years ago.
- The picture below shows the use of renewable energy accounting for the total energy from 1971 to 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money making attractions aimed at tourists Others believe it is the only way to save these traditions Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts Reason Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public 67
- It is a good thing if senior management workers in a company get a much higher salary than other workers in the same company Do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people believe that studying literature is important for individual character building while others think it is a waste of time Discuss both point of view and provide your own opinion 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, look, second, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1064.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.41493775934 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26728461722 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48132780083 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.9516929203 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 66.5 112.824112599 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 15.0625 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.09268292683 318% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143071236087 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532557836352 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918827976204 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11365525734 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111066460005 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.9 13.2329268293 52% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.71 11.4140731707 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, look, second, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1064.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.41493775934 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26728461722 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48132780083 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.9516929203 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 66.5 112.824112599 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 15.0625 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.09268292683 318% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143071236087 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532557836352 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918827976204 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11365525734 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111066460005 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.9 13.2329268293 52% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.71 11.4140731707 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.