The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009

Essay topics:

The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009.

From the year of 2000 to 2009 the percentages & students
attending four secondary School types were different from school
to another.
In the 2000th the voluntary-controlled schools & the grammar schools
had a higher percentage of students, unlike the specialist Schools & Community Schools. By the years, the proportions of the Pupils attending the grammar Schools and the voluntary. controlled schools were decreasing, since the percentage of the grammar Schools in 2000 were 24 %o & in 2005 the percentage decreased to 19%, and the same in 2009 the percentage decreased to 12 %.

In contrairy the percentage of Students in the community Schools was increasing by the years. In 2000 the percents. was 12% this percentage enhanced in 2005 and became 32% & in 2009 the percentage reached up to 58%. But in the specialist school noticed that there is no different in the percentage of student attending the school by the years, just a slight decreasing.

In a nut shill, the table shows that the number of Pupils attending the Grammar & Voluntary-controlled schools is decreasing by the time. Otherwise, the community schools had a wonderful increasing in the percentage. And the Specialist Schools. the percentages were closely the same by the yours. Just a little de pression.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-27 tata 67 view
2023-07-27 tata 73 view
2023-07-27 tata view
2023-07-27 tata 61 view
2023-07-27 tata 73 view
Essays by user tata :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Controlled
... the grammar Schools and the voluntary. controlled schools were decreasing, since the perc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Was
...ing by the years. In 2000 the percents. was 12% this percentage enhanced in 2005 an...
^^^
Line 9, column 6, Rule ID: NUT_NOT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'not'?
Suggestion: not
...ears, just a slight decreasing. In a nut shill, the table shows that the number ...
^^^
Line 9, column 246, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...percentage. And the Specialist Schools. the percentages were closely the same by th...
^^^
Line 9, column 287, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'yours'?
Suggestion: the; yours
...he percentages were closely the same by the yours. Just a little de pression.
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1080.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29411764706 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26013993372 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.426470588235 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.936407877 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0769230769 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6923076923 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.15384615385 5.23603664747 22% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25855443204 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103411256312 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0984885034849 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170952238461 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0856862325981 0.0819641961636 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.