In recent years, there has been a rise in the use of performance-enhancing drugs in sports. What are the consequences of doping for athletes? What measures should be taken ?
Nowadays, using of performance-enhancing drugs by athletes became a conspicuous phenomenon. These actions are considered a type of cheating which much be faced. This essay will argue the negative consequences of taking these steroids and what actions should be taken against this behavior and abusers.
Undeniably, there is an awful phenomenon which threatens rules of justice and fair competition which is steroid abuse. frankly, this action is considered a type of cheating which destructive the main essence of sport. The essential Goal of practice sports for individuals is to be healthy; physically and mentally not to be the permeant winner all the time. Therefore, taking these steroids teaches new generations fraud and manipulation from a young age. Moreover, most types of steroids have bad effect on the body health on long term period.
Depending on what is mentioned above, fighting this manipulation is very important and needed. Firstly, procedure of deterrent punishment of violators must be taken in order to be an example for others to avoid this action. Secondly, spread the awareness of harmness of performance-enhancing drugs on the body. Also, explaining how this is not from ethics and morals for young athletes. Finally, conducting many periodic tests to examine athletes can lead to prevent this issue.
In conclusion, phenomenon of using performance-enhancing drugs has been increased recently. This action is considered a type of cheating and contradicts morals and ethics with the rules of justice and fair competition in sport. Taking actions against violators and raising awareness against using these steroids is crucial to get rid of this phenomenon.
- The charts below give information on UK spending habits for books bought over the internet Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram details the process of making leather products Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Some people think the manufacturers and shopping malls should sell fewer packaged products while others argue that people have the responsibility to buy products with less packaging Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999 and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the mai 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country 40
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 119, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Frankly
...air competition which is steroid abuse. frankly, this action is considered a type of ch...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 403, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'generations'' or 'generation's'?
Suggestion: generations'; generation's
...fore, taking these steroids teaches new generations fraud and manipulation from a young age...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, frankly, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1427.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46743295019 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25317816697 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547892720307 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.5055548699 49.4020404114 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.1875 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3125 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234947672507 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801586190276 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760501548076 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156257428821 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708748141399 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.