The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009.
The table compares the proportions of students who attended four different types of secondary schools; specialist schools, grammar schools, voluntary-controlled schools, and community school, in the 2000, 2005, and 2009 school years.
Overall, the community school is the only school in which her proportions increases over time, compared to the tree other schools in which all of their proportions decreases during the tree school years.
In fact, the community schools had the lowest proportion of students, compared to the tree other schools, with 12% of students who attended it in 2000. But in 2005, this proportion increases 20%. And finally, it continued to increase until it reached 58% in 2009, which is the highest proportions of students of all these tree schools.
Unlike the community schools, the proportions of the tree other schools decreases over time.
In particular, the voluntary-controlled schools who had the highest proportion of students of all tree schools in 2000, which was 52% of students, and this proportion decrease in 2005 and it went to 28%, but it was still the highest proportion compared to others in that year. But unfortunately, the proportion continues to decrease until in 2009 these schools lose their place in the highest proportion of students. The specialist schools and the grammar school decreases also during these tree school years, because the grammar schools decrease 12% and the specialist schools decrease 2%.
- People nowadays sleep less than they used to in the past What do you think is the reason behind this What are the effects on individuals and people around them 56
- Some people think that enjoying the present is more important than planning for the future for both countries and individuals To what extent do you agree or disagree
- The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing What factors contribute to job satisfaction for all workers How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, second, so, still, in fact, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1236.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37391304348 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01701538819 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.378260869565 0.547539520022 69% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.482926829268 1449% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7249745015 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.333333333 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5555555556 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265476522438 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138966353042 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551818394347 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175177421455 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540815229937 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.