The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009.
The table shows a comparison between four secondary school types regarding the proportions of pupils attending between 2000 and 2009.
As overall, the first three schools; Specialist Schools, Grammar Schools and Voluntary-Controlled Schools went downwards in the percentages of attending pupils through years. The only one type that went upwards was the community schools although it was the lowest back in 2000.
The proportions of pupils attended the Specialist and Grammar Schools almost took the same path. They started (12% and 24% respectively), and got lower slightly, then became the lowest in 2009. They ended up approximately the same percentage. Unlike, the Voluntary- Controlled Schools that also got lower but in a sharp way. It started with the highest percentage (52%) in 2000 and reached (20 %) in 2009.
On the other hand, Community Schools is the only type that increased by time. It started, like the Specialist schools, with 12% in 2000 and went up to 32% in 2005, till it reached the highest (58%) in 2009. Thus, the community schools is the only type that succeeded at attracting more pupils over time between 2000 and 2009.
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 wor
- In recent years there has been growing interest in the relationship between equality and personal achievement Some people believe that individuals can achieve more in egalitarian societies Others believe that high levels of personal achievement are possib 61
- Public libraries should provide books and not waste their limited resources on expensive high tech media such as software videos or Dvds Do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people say that the increasing use of modern technology has made work a lot easier and quicker to accomplish Others however argue that it has only made people busier 56
- Happiness is often considered difficult to define Why is this What factors determine happiness 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The table shows a comparison between fou...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...upils attending between 2000 and 2009. As overall, the first three schools; Spe...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...though it was the lowest back in 2000. The proportions of pupils attended the S...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a sharp way" with adverb for "sharp"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...trolled Schools that also got lower but in a sharp way. It started with the highest percentage...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 52% in 2000 and reached 20 % in 2009. On the other hand, Community Schools is ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, regarding, second, so, then, thus, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10160427807 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82998719498 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534759358289 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6610440992 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7272727273 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.491626564002 0.215688989381 228% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18106939027 0.103423049105 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.212303996168 0.0843802449381 252% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.357417594265 0.15604864568 229% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.252961180246 0.0819641961636 309% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.