The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009.
This table shows the percentage of students that goes to four different secondary schools and how it changes over the years. According to the table the four schools can be divided into two sectors the first sector contains three schools, which are specialist, grammar and community schools. The second sector only has voluntary-controlled schools.
Firstly, the first sector has three schools specialist, grammar and community schools, those particular three schools their percentage is decreasing in a span of nine years. In fact, if you put that table in a line chart all three schools are going to have the same trajectory. Unlike the other sector.
Secondly, the second sector only has one school which is voluntary-controlled schools, in contrast this the only school that its percentage increases over the same span of nine years, that also means that parents in the future tend to make their children go to those kinds of schools.
Overall in the end this percentage for each school depends on what the parents want for their children and also depends on the child's needs , like if this child is disabled then he needs a specialist school that deals with disability and so on .
- Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence while others think that intelligence can be measured in other ways What is your opinion 56
- The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009 61
- Some people think it would be better for large companies and industry to move to regional areas outside large urban centers do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Some people think that it would be better for large companies and industry to move to regional areas outside large urban centers Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 140, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ren and also depends on the childs needs , like if this child is disabled then he ...
^^
Line 4, column 244, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ool that deals with disability and so on .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, in contrast, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 19.0 5.60731707317 339% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02030456853 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8206670706 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527918781726 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.1019704941 43.030603864 193% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.625 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0971393587986 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475457211419 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374452543022 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0640815620622 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232394428061 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.