Question:
The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.
The table compares the underground railway networks in six metropolises regarding the opening date, the length of route, and the number of commuters per year.
Overall, it is evident that the three older rail systems in London, Paris, and Tokyo are larger and have more people traveling each year compared to those opened later in the remaining cities.
The underground railway system in London, which was introduced in 1863 and has 394 kilometers of route, comes first in terms of age and size. Opened in 1900, the Paris network is half as large as the London one. However, it carries 1191 million people annually, much higher than the figure of the oldest system. Despite ranking third in size, the Tokyo rail network is the most commonly used with 1927 passengers per year.
The railway system in Washington DC with 126 kilometers of route and 144 million passengers each year becomes the largest and busiest among the three younger systems. While the size of the newest network in Los Angeles doubled that of the Kyoto one, the number of commuters using these two systems is nearly the same, at 50 million and 45 million respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-14 | nhatvynguyen711 | view | |
| 2023-05-26 | hieu13092006 | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-04 | tranhien862002 | 100 | view |
| 2023-05-03 | nltnhi2104 | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-04 | tragiang0606 | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: third
...e of the oldest system. Despite ranking third in size, the Tokyo rail network is the most com...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, regarding, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9175257732 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37681971837 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603092783505 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0238027789 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.25 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138889543382 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617292697393 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594103677413 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0925606162799 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054070818144 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.