Recycling rates for selected materials
The graphic in question shows the recycling rate of four group of materials throughout 28 years in a particular country. The material groups are the following ones: paper and cardboards, glass containers, aluminum cans, and plastics, represented in a blue, red, green and gray line respectively.
Overall, the rate of recycling has been increasing along the years with regards all the material groups except paper and cardboards. The last peaked in 1994 when it reached 80% of recycling rate, then decreased by 10% during the following 16 years. Despite of this decline, paper and cardboard are the most common materials recycled in the past three decades.
Opposed to paper and cardboards, the recycling of glass, plastic, and aluminum have been increasing in the last two decades. 60% of the glass containers was recycled in 2010 in comparison to only 40% in 1990. The recycling of plastic is increasing in a quite slow rate, it went from about 2% in 1990 to 8% twenty years later. Whereas the recycling of aluminum jumped from 2% in 1986 to incredible 45% in 2010, being the most exponential increasing curve among all the four material groups.
In conclusion, the graphic shows positive trends towards an increase of recycling over time. This might reflect a larger awareness regarding environmental preservation of the today’s society when compared to thirty years ago.
- topic 27 : Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People should sometimes do things that they do not enjoy doing. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Is it better to enjoy your money when you earn it, or is it better to save for some time in the future? 66
- Many people have learned a foreign language in their own country; other have learned a foreign language in the country in which it is spoken. Which is better? Give the advantages if each and support your viewpoint. 60
- You are planning to study abroad. What do you think you will like and dislike about this experience? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 70
- Many people believe that it is very important to make large amounts of money, while others are satisfied to earn a comfortable living.analyze each viewpoint and take a stand. give specific reasons 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, so, then, whereas, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1161.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79637861051 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573333333333 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.6672927547 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.545454545 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4545454545 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28151712208 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116944130162 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681160547192 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175821337426 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831486944355 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.